Becca Reads

11.30.2006

NY Times 10 Best Books of 2006

Here they are.

I've heard of seven, read one and a few pages of another, actively want to read one plus the rest of the pages of another, wouldn't mind reading one, feel like I should want to read two, have no interest in the rest.

Obituaries

I read the obituaries. I don't go searching for them, and I don't read every word from the first line of tiny print to the last, but if I pass them on my journey through the newspaper, I check the big ones to see if there are any that interest me--people I know, names or headlines that catch my eye--and then sometimes I glance over the little ones, especially the long little ones, which list accomplishments and memberships and those left behind. In No-Longer-Red State Capital City, where the print was clearer and there were often photos, I read the little ones more often, but here the print is just too tiny, unless I'm really interested.

Why do I read them? For famous people, because I like to know what's going on and what happened. For ordinary people, because I'm fascinated with how people live their lives. In general, because of my terrified fascination with death and loss.

S never reads the obituaries. But last night when he got home he went immediately to the newspaper and found the obituaries. There was a big one of the guy he buys his beef from, a young guy, very young, who had this incredible beef farm. He died over the weekend, in an accident, and S had heard about it that day at work. We never met him, but he knew people we knew, including our downstairs neighbor, in a random coincidence. And the beef, I don't eat it, but everyone who has eaten it says it's the best beef they've ever eaten. And he was so young.

Sometimes I wish I didn't read the obituaries.

11.27.2006

Movies People Love That Don't Do It For Me

Cinema Paradiso.

Napoleon Dynamite.

Little Miss Sunshine. (I knew I wasn't going to like it, but so many people loved it that I reneged on my gut. But I was right to begin with. I liked when they pushed the van; I liked the #1 Proust scholar; of course I liked the pageant, who wouldn't? But overall? Yet another dysfunctional family road trip movie that's supposed to be funny and heart-warming but is just too pathetic along the way for me. Sorry.)

(If you want to know the best dysfunctional family road trip movie ever, it's Flirting With Disaster, and, yes, Ben Stiller does seem to be something of a contrapuntal theme these days.)

Edited to add: I knew there was another movie in this category: About Schmidt. Which is very much the same thing as Little Miss Sunshine, if you substitute RV for van, wedding for beauty pageant, and old lonely guy for dysfunctional family.

Anorexia and Miscarriages

That anorexia is one of my greatest fears for my daughters reveals how privileged my life is. Yet there it is: this is my life and that is my fear. They are just five and ten, but I scrutinize them regularly for perfectionist tendencies and unhealthy eating, though I'm not sure if I'm looking for signs or causes. One of the many reasons I hate my own overly-critical nature is my pop-cultural sense of parental pressure as yet another cause. I am ever vigilant in promoting positive body image and condemning our cultural focus on thin, even as I am secretly thankful for the lanky bodies that I hope will protect them from the compulsion to diet. So I read this article with fascination and fear. How do people bear it?

On the other hand, I found this essay completely uninteresting, in part because, although the author is almost my age, I am of a different developmental demographic, which is to say, fear of anorexia, not fear of miscarriage, but also because I feel like I have read this essay so many times (career woman certain she could have a baby later discovers otherwise, regrets, and tries to warn younger woman), and I'm sure it's a painful experience that I'm glad to have missed, but I'd rather read an essay that says something new.

11.26.2006

Happy Feet

J: It's like Moulin Rouge for penguins.

And that's only the beginning.

Ty Burr (best movie reviewer around: smart, erudite, funny, generally agrees with me): What do you get when you cross "March of the Penguins," Disney's "High School Musical," "The Ugly Duckling," a runaway jukebox, "Footloose," Joseph Campbell, "Riverdance," a Greenpeace board meeting, and five hits of prime, Woodstock-era brown acid? You get "Happy Feet," the new computer-animated family film that is quite simply the most bizarre thing under the Antarctic sun.

Yeah, that pretty much sums it up.

You've got your conformity narrative (evils thereof), your religious fundamentalism narrative (ditto), your prodigal son narrative, your quest, your March of the Penguins imitation, your environmental depredation, your shockingly-almost-unhappy ending, your wisecracking sidekicks, your George-Clinton-meets-Barry-White guru, your minor breathy females (mother and girlfriend, respectively), and they're all penguins, and they sing and dance, and the finale is an endless vista of penguins tap-dancing to Stevie Wonder's "I Wish." I kid you not.

Truly one of the most insane things I've ever seen. And it's the most popular movie in America.

Am I not getting something, or are they not getting something?

(And if you're wondering whether it's too scary, well, we wondered too. A lot. We googled "happy feet scary" and checked out the IMDB comments and even emailed Ty Burr. There was much conflicting assessment. M decided to bow out. E insisted on going. Three times she said it was scary (the birds, the leopard seals, and the killer whales, as might have been predicted), and I covered her eyes and told her it would be OK (though when Mumble in the zoo started hallucinating his mother dissolving into ash, I had serious doubts). At the end she said she loved it and she was glad I didn't ask if she wanted to leave. Go figure.)

(That night we watched Zoolander which was entertaining enough, especially the gasoline fight to Wham's "Wake Me Up Before You Go Go," and I was struck by the thematic similarities, though the only one I can remember now is his penguin pajamas.)

11.25.2006

Litvinenko

If you are fascinated by the could-this-really-be-happening-or-is-it-all-just-a-John-Le-Carre-novel story of the former Soviet spy murdered by radiation in London, you need to be reading The Independent and The Guardian (which, as I write this, have fascinatingly different lead stories which show, once again, how much more vital the British newspaper business is than the American).

11.20.2006

Dirty Blonde

I haven't wanted to read anyone else on Dirty Blonde: The Diaries of Courtney Love until I wrote about it. There are apparently vehement letters on Salon, Emily Nussbaum reviews it in yesterday's NY Times Book Review, and I'm sure the Amazon hordes are waxing vituperative, but I'm not even going to find the links because I don't want to catch a glimpse before I'm ready. Now I'm feeling ready, though, especially with that NY Times Book Review sitting on the table in the living room, so I'm going to go for it, even though I haven't read the book cover-to-cover, which is what I was waiting for, because I generally don't write about things before I've finished them, but then I realized that this isn't really a cover-to-cover book for me, it's more of a dip-in-here-and-there, flip-through-the-pages-and-read-what-intrigues-me kind of book.

And I like it a lot. So there.

Now, I'm a Courtney fan from way back and don't talk to me about rumors that Kurt and what's-his-name wrote her songs or...oh god, I'm not going to list all the trash-talk Courtney has been on the receiving end of because either you know it all or you don't care. But Live Through This is just a killer album (when it first came out, I was in L.A. and training for my first marathon, but it was December and dark early so I ran at the gym a lot, and "Doll Parts" was in heavy rotation on whatever L.A. radio station I was listening to and I remember hearing it while I ran seven-minute miles on the treadmill and loving every single note and word) (I have never in my life run a seven-minute mile anywhere but on a treadmill), and I love Celebrity Skin ("Malibu" is one of those songs that gets stuck in my head regularly), and, OK, America's Sweetheart is just same old same old, but she was awesome as Larry Flynt's wife in that movie, and, yeah, she's made a lot of bad choices, really bad choices, but when we saw her on tour for Live Through This she was a total demon (and I've been trying to remember if we saw her both at the Fillmore and in Palo Alto, and I'm thinking we did, but I'm wondering why we would have, and maybe it was just Palo Alto, but I don't think so, and A or Postacademic, if you're reading this and you remember, can you clarify, and was that the show where A got mad at the woman in front of us and pulled out strands of her long bleached hair, one by one, so she kept slapping at her head, not sure what was going on, and then she turned around and glared at us, sure we had something to do with it, even though she couldn't figure out what it was?).

So I'm all about Courtney and I've defended her for years (in a sure-lots-of-things-she-does-are-indefensible-but-she's-still-great kind of way), but then I saw this documentary about her on YouTube which has, alas, been removed at the request of the copyright owner because its content was used without permission, and I thought maybe I was finally over Courtney, or Courtney was just over, because she came off as a total bimbo and one thing I always thought about Courtney was that she was smart. I mean, you don't accomplish everything she's done without being smart. But in that movie, which I only watched part of because it was kind of unbearable, she just chanted a lot and showed off her clothes and bragged about her Hollywood connections and seemed really spacy and pathetic.

But Dirty Blonde redeems her. It's a scrapbook as much as a diary, with diary excerpts, song lyrics, photos, notes. It's basically in chronological order, though there's no explanatory narrative, and if you don't already know the Courtney story, it's going to be pretty confusing, though there are helpful notes at the end, but, let's face it, nobody is going to buy this book except for fans, so that's fine. And it's beautifully designed, which I always like in a book, especially a book like this (I thought the Kurt Cobain diaries were really badly executed as a book, but that's another post, which I probably won't write).

And, yes, it's narcissistic, and, yes, it's opportunistic, but what the hell, that's Courtney, and I like reading her lyrics as they are written, and her plans, even if I know how they turned out, and her anguish and excitement, and I like seeing her pictures, and I'm sure I'll never read it cover-to-cover, but I keep picking it up and flipping through it, reading a page here and several pages there, and, yes, I still like Courtney Love, and, yes, I'm looking forward to the next album (with full awareness that it could just as easily suck).

Edited to add: I like Emily Nussbaum's review. Salon is typically having-it-every-which-way pretentious (God, Courtney is ridiculous, but, hey, it kind of works, though mainly I'll just drop a lot of references so that you think I'm really smart) (thanks to M for the correct spelling of pretentious). The vitriol of the Salon letters is also typical--typically boring.

Edited once more to add: S says we only saw her in Palo Alto and the show where A plucked the hairs was Dave Alvin at the Paradise Lounge.

11.19.2006

Rock Kids

This article makes me resolve only to let my kids listen to Disney. And maybe Raffi. It makes S really glad we don't live in Park Slope. (Note to disingenous NY Times Style Section reporter: there is, um, a difference between a couple of teenagers from St. Ann's starting a band--because, um, that is what teenagers do--and elementary school kids getting gigs because the drummer from the Jon Spencer Blues Explosion is backing them up or their dad used to work for Caroline.)

11.17.2006

Yoga Journal

I bought my first copy of Yoga Journal this month because Dawn has a cover story on forgiveness which is just lovely. But enough about that.

This post is about my first encounter with Yoga Journal, a magazine that many people have recently told me how much they love. My lack of encounters with Yoga Journal thus far has to do, I think, with my general lack of interest in self-help, which also relates to the fact that I never read parenting magazines, except in the pediatrician's office, where I'd rather read Parenting than Redbook, though really I'd rather read People. Basically, for me, there is a distinction between the things I do and the things I read, though the exception would be food writing, which I am quite interested in, though then again, with food, I might be more interested in the writing than in the eating, which would reinforce the doing/reading dichotomy (if you didn't follow that, I was trying to say that I don't feel the need to read about things I do...you know, this argument totally doesn't work, because I also like to read about travel, sometimes, so maybe it does come down to a broad definition of self-help/learning/informational writing that doesn't interest me, but I am no longer interested in this paragraph, so I will go on).

I could say really obvious things about Yoga Journal like "who knew there were so many yoga products?!" and "my, that thread of self-satisfied narcissism is practically a scarf" (trying to work with the thread metaphor there, but I'm not sure there's a viable image to substitute for Really Big Thread).

But what I really want to talk about, and this may go back to the self-help/learning/informational thing, is reading about yoga poses. For my birthday, I asked for yoga cards, and I got them, and I flipped through them, and I got really excited, and then I never used them. Why? Because I can't figure out how I'm supposed to read a card, or, especially, a sequence of cards, while I'm doing yoga. Do I read them first and then do my yoga really fast so I can remember? Or do I lay them out next to my mat and have to keep turning to look at them while I'm doing my yoga?

Same thing with these long articles about bow pose and backbend. Do I read them and gain new understanding and then go do yoga with a tranformed capacity? Do I fold the magazine open and put them next to my mat so I can refer to them mid-practice? But there's an awful lot of small print there, and it feels really un-yoga to be reading in the middle of yoga.

Seriously, I totally don't get it.

Perhaps the dirty little secret of Yoga Journal is that everyone is really reading it for the fancy yoga stuff, not the detailed instructions on poses.

Or maybe everyone else is just more enlightened than I am.

Edited to add: I just realized what I was talking about in that paragraph I lost interest in: how-to, I have no interest in how-to.

11.12.2006

The New Yorker

This week we again encounter that rare phenomenon: the New Yorker I read cover to cover (issue date: November 13, 2006), including:

- a fascinating and deeply disturbing piece about Lagos, Nigeria. I just started All Souls, about which I will certainly be posting anon, but what struck me in the very first chapter is how the best non-fiction makes you aware of things you had no idea of, and the very best makes you aware of how in fact you had no idea of things you thought you knew. Lagos? I had no idea. Though I'm a tiny bit--really very small but still there--suspicious of the purportedly objective tone of the essay. Not that I don't think Lagos is like that, but the generalizations seem a bit, not general, not one-sided, but, perhaps, disputable? Though then again, maybe not.

- a profile of Olafur Eliasson, who has one of the best names ever, and is from Iceland, and is one of those paragons of creativity who amaze me, and did The Weather Project at the Tate which was so so cool (yes, we lay on the floor and looked up at ourselves in the mirrors).

- a meandering Janet Malcolm piece on Alice B. Toklas that is informative, but oddly cranky in that Janet "I was sued and now I have deep sympathies that you can't possibly understand" Malcolm sort of way.

- a disappointingly mediocre Helen Simpson story (if you like your contemporary women's literary realism short, and with an occasional touch of the magical, you must read Getting a Life which is just unbelievably good).

- a lovely and very informative piece on Leonard Woolf (the other pieces are, alas, unlinkable except for the Simpson story which, take my word for it, you do not need to read).

11.10.2006

Willsun Mock

There's a story like this behind every single dead soldier. And behind every one of the 150,000 dead Iraqis. So let's get on with it, Democrats. (And while I was googling for a source for the Iraqi death count, I found this, which is from several months ago, so maybe it is too late, but still worth reading.)

The Brambles

The dramatic events of this week are giving me the urge to blog a la Not Quite Sure. I mean, with K-Fed now Fed-Ex, and our country once again d/Democratic, there is much reason for joy and much to blog. But I am nothing if not disciplined (OK, I'm nothing), and I must stick to the topics at hand. Which today are apparently Tessie and Eliza Minot (who of course is not the kind of writer to have a website, but if you have the infamous Times Select, you can learn something about her here).

Eliza Minot is an exquisite writer. Her instrument of choice is the comma, and with it she plays a symphony of daily life, the images and details accumulating like Mozart's notes (apologies if the Mozart reference destroys the metaphor, but I know next to nothing [see above] about classical music, and I just have the barest inkling that I don't want Beethoven here, because he is ponderous and bombastic, and perhaps Mozart would work because he is light and full of notes, but I'm probably completely wrong, and all I know is I don't want to say Pachelbel, even though that is kind of a little bit what I'm thinking, because the connotations of Pachelbel are so lame, but then again sentiment might be a useful reference, so if anyone can help me here, either because they have a sense of what I'm trying to say, or because they've read the book, it would be most useful).

Minot really is a beautiful writer, and she is startlingly observant, the kind of writer who makes you go, again and again, "Yes! How did she know?" Or rather, "I know that too, but how did she think to write it down, and so evocatively?!" And I'll provide lots of examples in a moment, but first, two larger observations.

1) I've been feeling, lately, that I remember nothing about my children and their lives. What was E like at two? How did M learn to read? I'm known in my family as the one with the memory, but my children are so present, in the here and now, that they erase their own pasts. And then I wonder, too, if I notice them enough in the present. I mean, I live with them, and they are everything and everywhere, and yet, who are they? Do I really know them? All these other mothers seem so aware of their children, their children's thoughts and issues and needs, but I just kind of feel like mine are there, and I hang out with them, and I help meet their needs as best I can, and I (mostly) enjoy them, and I (sometimes) wish they would disappear, and that's about it.

Eliza Minot will not have this problem. It's hard not to read Margaret Bright, heroine of The Brambles, suburban New Jersey mother of three, as an avatar for Eliza Minot, suburban New Jersey mother of three, and I often had the same feeling I have when I read Ayelet Waldman's Mommy-Track Mysteries, which is that she could only be writing this if she had experienced it, which is not to take a totally essentialist tack on the writing process, but to note that the realist details are so realistic that they seem as if they can only come from life (or else Minot has the best imagination for motherhood divorced from motherhood itself of any writer I know) (or, to decouple this analysis from motherhood altogether, just think Hemingway, World War I, and the hospital).

2) After a while, all that exquisite prose and intensity of detail did, I must admit, get a little wearing, even, perhaps, bordering on cloying. I started to feel a faint desire, amidst the beauty, for plot. Then, eventually, plot came, and it was a bit preposterous. I suppose the plot was meant to explain the pain suffered by some of the characters, but it didn't really suffice, and the pain itself was somewhat preposterous (why didn't Max just tell his wife already? oh yeah, to keep the wheels of fiction turning).

If I could do that below the fold thing, which once, between them, Phantom and Dawn enabled me to do, but I have long since forgotten how I, or, really, they, did it, I would do it now, because what follows is a string of quotes that struck me, those moments when I went, "Yes, that's how it is!" So if quotes aren't your thing, you can stop reading now, because all that's left is quotes, and maybe a little commentary on the quotes.

Back then she looked in mirrors at herself, Rollerbladed the days away, saw movies, lots of movies, sometimes alone, sometimes back to back. (15) (I still look in mirrors, and I never rollerbladed, but the movies, oh how I miss the movies.)

They were like hired private detectives, the way at least one of them would descend upon her after she'd hung up, demanding immediate information. Usually at least one of them was there long before the phone call ended, asking for things they already had in their hands, orbiting the room, winding through her legs like a cat, getting in her way, looking for things, even if they'd been happily involved in something before the phone rang. (51) (Oh yeah, the phone thing, makes me INSANE.)

After getting dressed she brushes her hair, tosses the excess hair from the brush into the toilet... (88) (Does everyone do that, or just me and Eliza Minot?)

The huge bathroom (meaning two people could stand in it) had both a bathtub and a window, with a tiled floor of tiny white octagons and a thin ribbon of black around the border of the room like hockey tape. (103) (Every bathroom in New York, but whoever thought to write it down?)

Margaret puts it up there on the fridge for no reason that she's aware of...But most likely she put it up there for the same reason she tapes up the paroxysmal paintings and precise drawings done by her kids, as a method for trapping time somehow as their long little lives race ahead so quickly like tossed balls of yarn. (166) (Why am I saving E's coloring sheets from kindergarten, black xeroxed pumpkins overlaid with her orange crayon? Exactly.)

She's thought before that her life is simply made up of snippets, a connect-the-dots of moments of clarity, of instants, big and small, where life softly explodes in her head, which remain with her either because she simply decided to remember them for no reason at all or because it was something that was seared into her consciousness as if with a branding iron. (170) (A reverse description of the memory problem: I remember specifics, images, events, some important, some so minor I can't believe I remember them, but the big picture, the big picture always escapes me. Then again, this is a problem for me in general.)

It makes Margaret think of when her babies were born, that deferment of time and reality with its disrupted sleep and emotions like you're on drugs. (214) (I loved the weeks after my babies were born, and that is a perfect description of it.)

Tessie

I don't know what made me think of "Tessie" the other day, but something did, so here's the video, and here's the making of the video, and if "Tessie" doesn't make you happy, there's something musically and athletically wrong with you, and I have some confused thoughts in my head about triumph and optimism and the Red Sox and the Democracts, and I fear if I straighten out the thoughts, they will be problematic, so I'll twist them into the general optimism of the brightness of the moment on this beautiful sunny November day and say: this November, the Democrats; next November, the Red Sox!!

[Phantom, this one's for you all, and Sandra, go download the song already!]

11.08.2006

What Am I Reading Today?

Election results. Compulsively. And I especially like this one. [link from one of Phantom's commenters]

Buying Books

Life's been a little much lately, not bad, just...much. Work, kids, more kids, more work, laundry, and then, to top it all off, jury duty. So when jury duty ended mid-afternoon yesterday (guilty), and S was home with kids, I decided I deserved a reward for surviving the previous five days, and I took myself off to the mall, which is halfway between jury duty and home, and which I've been trying to get to for weeks. The mall was not a reward--in fact, it was hellish--but the work trousers that I finally found--Liz Claiborne petites at a truly hellish Macy's--were rewarding.

Then it was time for the real reward. I headed for the big-box bookstore where I got All Souls for S (who just read Easter Rising and loved it--both are on the top of my ever-expanding list) and some of our favorite board books for the new baby next door (Goodnight Moon, Good Dog Carl, The Very Hungry Caterpillar, and Barnyard Dance) (has anyone noticed that regular books now all come as board books, which seems, to my mind, to dilute the babyness of board books, I mean, why does a baby need Olivia? then again, I think all those books, which we got in board, and which I thus think of as board, might have originally been regular, which makes me completely moot on this point) (I also saw these incredibly silly books, which made me feel way past the baby demographic, which, of course, I am) (not past the baby demographic because I didn't get the books, but because I imagined the yuppie baby showers at which the non-moms would coo over the books and I had no interest, indeed, was kind of disgusted) (I do have a sense of humor, really, I do, I'm just so bored of the coolness of babydom, even the self-mocking coolness of babydom, which, in our pseudo-ironic age, is, of course, the apotheosis of cool, supposedly).

I know, we're not talking rewards for me, yet. But we're getting there.

Then I sat on a stool and read the first 50 pages of Cancer Vixen, which I quite enjoyed despite, or perhaps even partly because of, the name-dropping fabulousness which some review objected to, but I found humorously self-mocking (unlike the boring self-mocking of those baby books). These days I am awed by creativity of all sorts, but especially the kind that can combine visual and verbal, which I am absolutely uncapable of, being a solely verbal kind of person, although my dear friend K the graphic designer is determined to prove that I have the visual deep within me. But she's wrong. Anyway, Cancer Vixen is definitely to be finished, but I think at the bookstore, as it is a quick read and not something I particularly need to own (I did start out wondering whether there was a graphic memoir section, and I think if Fun Home had not been out of stock, I would have bought them both, on some kind of principle I can't define, but Cancer Vixen was in--surprise--the cancer section, and Fun Home was out of stock, so I didn't).

And now we get to the real reward, the book I bought, for me. Yes, my lonely copy of Kurt Cobain's journals is lonely no more, for I now have my very own copy of Courtney Love's diaries, and I really need to get some work done now, so I will tell you about that another time.

11.06.2006

Now Playing on the Vehicular CD Player

Since I've already gone and added movies to the mix (haven't seen any lately, sorry, though still trying to make it to Marie Antoinette), I might as well take the next step to music.

I have a new car. If I still had the old blog, there would have been much blogging of the agonizing, albeit mercifully brief, saga of the new car, but suffice to say I now have a nice car, which is itself a trifle agonizing, because my old ridiculous car had become very much part of my identity, even, one might say--though I tried not to say it, to avoid being obnoxious, and ridiculous, like my car, though it was, secretly, in my head, kind of important to me--an indie statement, of sorts.

I keep remembering our realtor, when we were looking for a house in Red State Capital City Suburb, and she showed us a house that was a bit more than we were looking for--a bit more money, a bit more high-end--I remember her saying, "It's OK, you deserve a nice house." In the end we didn't like that particular house, but I keep saying to myself, "It's OK, I'm a fortysomething professional mom, I can drive this car." And it's not even a fancy car, it's just so much more than my old car, and I just need to get used to it.

But the point here is that my nice new car has a CD player, and that I got used to that immediately (old indie car had a tape player, broken).

And the real point is twofold:

1) M, E, and I have our first shared pop music obsession (OK, it's belated, but nobody's perfect). We are madly in love with KT Tunstall's "Suddenly I See" which, I would venture to suggest, is a perfect pop song--politically incorrect but emotionally true, if superficial, lyrics aside (though one might argue that politically correct but emotionally true, if superficial, lyrics are definitional criteria for perfect pop songs).

We play it every time we get in the car. It's Track 9. We sing along. If we're taking a short drive and we arrive at our destination before it ends, we keep the car running. We dance in our seats. We shake our fingers at each other. We love this song.

2) I never realized Yankee Hotel Foxtrot is about love--the whole album, I mean. The thing is, I rarely put on music at home. I live with music fiends (who always put on music), I kind of like quiet (which I rarely get), and I just am not in the constant music habit. Even when I do put on a CD, I pay attention to the first few songs and then get involved in what I'm doing and forget to listen. So I know the first few songs of a lot of albums really well. But in the car you have nothing to do but listen, and I have been listening to Yankee Hotel Foxtrot, and it's about love and I love it.

I mean, of course I love it, it's Wilco, but I'm feeling very Desert Island Discs about it at the moment, which makes me wonder what my other Desert Island Discs would be: Elton John's greatest hits, I'm sure, and something Dave Alvin, though I don't know which, then something loud and punky and raucous, maybe Nirvana, and something peaceful, maybe The Koln Concerts--oh god, how white and male and predictable--how many records do you get on Desert Island Discs anyway? I'm thinking five, but perhaps ten? Can't check, must stop, because I'm starting to feel like I really do match my nice, new, not-at-all-indie car. Ugh.

(In case you can't bear the mystery, it's a 2004 Subaru Outback Wagon, and now you know everything there is to know about me.)

Note on Reading

Everyone reads at jury duty.

Paris

Dr. B. says Times Select is free this week, so go go go right this very minute and read Maira Kalman on Paris!

11.02.2006

Closeted Fundamentalists

I can't help it: I just love this stuff.

Edited to add: Here's more. Of course he did; why else would he resign?

Edited again to add: Confession (no specifics, but they should be out any minute).

11.01.2006

Lorrie Moore

Confession: I have never read Lorrie Moore. I know. Shameful. A friend even lent me Self-Help, eighteen months ago, and I can tell you exactly where it is: on the floor behind the laundry basket, where it landed when it fell off my dresser. Maybe seven months ago.

Realization: Lorrie Moore is indeed as fabulous as they say. Of course.

Source of realization:The Lorrie Moore story in this week's New Yorker.

And now I have to go all Jenny on you and quote madly, because this is just so unbelievably good.

First paragraph: Although Kit and Rafe had met in the peace movement, marching, organizing, making no-nukes signs, now they wanted to kill each other. They had become, also, a little pro-nuke. Married for two decades of precious, precious life, she and Rafe seemed currently to be partners only in anger and dislike, their old, lusty love mutated to rage. It was both their shame and demise that hate (like love) could not live on air. And so in this, their newly successful project together, they were complicitous and synergistic. They were nurturing, homeopathic, and enabling. They spawned and raised their hate together, cardiovascularly, spiritually, organically. In tandem, as a system, as a dance team of bad feeling, they had shoved their hate center stage and shone a spotlight down for it to seize. Do your stuff, baby! Who is the best? Whos the man?

A few paragraphs later: Of course, later she would understand that all this meant that he was involved with another woman, but at the time, protecting her own vanity and sanity, she was working with two hypotheses only: brain tumor or space alien.

And soon after that: Kit sighed again. “Yes, the toxic military-crafts business poisoning our living space. Do I fight? I don’t fight, I just, well, O.K.—I ask a few questions from time to time. I ask, ‘What the hell are you doing?’ I ask, ‘Are you trying to asphyxiate your entire family?’ I ask, ‘Did you hear me?’ Then I ask, ‘Did you hear me?’ again. Then I ask, ‘Are you deaf?’ I also ask, ‘What do you think a marriage is? I’m really just curious to know,’ and also, ‘Is this your idea of a well-ventilated place?’ A simple interview, really. I don’t believe in fighting. I believe in giving peace a chance. I also believe in internal bleeding.”

Incredible, no? But what are you doing still hanging out at this silly blog? Go read the story already. Me? I'm going to go rescue that copy of Self-Help.

The Dilemma of the Joy

(Isn't that just a great title for a blog post?)

The NY Times does not make me want to go out and buy it.

Can't seem to find any other reviews. It did only come out yesterday. Maybe Sunday.

If you scroll down the Amazon page, you'll see that Booklist and Publisher's Weekly are happy, but somehow they aren't exactly the authorities I would choose to evaluate my cookbooks.

May have to trek to the bookstore and take a look. I mean, I can't imagine not buying it, but, on the other hand, why buy it?